The popular restaurant attracts large crowds, but has not escaped the attention of the Fair Work Ombudsman. Photo: Supplied
The operators of Chinatown's highly-awarded and ever-popular Mamak restaurant are facing court after allegedly underpaying six employees to a tune of more than $87,000 and using false records to disguise the underpayments.
The Malaysian restaurant on Goulburn Street, which is famous for its long queues and fast service, allegedly paid rates as low as $11 an hour to the casual staff over more than three years.
One employee is believed to have been underpaid by $26,793 while another was allegedly owed $21,538.
Roti canai at Mamak. Photo: Edwina Pickles
In total, the workers - four of whom were international students and one a bridging visa holder - were allegedly underpaid $87,349 between February 2012 and April 2015.
Under the Restaurant Industry Award, five adults should have been paid more than $22 for normal hours, while a junior casual staffer could claim more than $13, according to the Fair Work Ombudsman.
While under investigation by Fair Work, the restaurant allegedly disguised the underpayments, which have since been reimbursed, by providing false documents as well as breaking laws relating to pay slips and access to information.
The government body has commenced legal action against restaurant owner-operators Joon Hoe Lee, Julian Lee and Alan Wing-Keung Au and their company Mamak Pty Ltd, which also oversees restaurants in Chatswood and Melbourne.
The owners face penalties of up to $10,200 per contravention while the company may be fined up to $51,000 per contravention.
The workplace watchdog has not yet confirmed if it is investigating the company's Melbourne restaurant on Lonsdale Street.
John Hart, CEO of Restaurants and Catering Association Australia said he could not comment on the individual case, but that while the industry body would never condone any sort of breach of awards or employment conditions, restaurant operators face an "extremely complex" pay structure.
"In an environment that is as extremely complex as our awards, it doesn't surprise me when any business is found to be in non-compliance.
"There is in excess of 60 different rates an individual may be paid for performing fundamentally the same job."
A directions hearing is listed for February 5 at Sydney's Federal Circuit Court.
Fairfax Media has contacted Mamak for comment.
DO YOU KNOW MORE? Contact Esther Han on firstname.lastname@example.org